↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Biology, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kanae Kikugawa, Kazutaka Katoh, Shigehiro Kuraku, Hiroshi Sakurai, Osamu Ishida, Naoyuki Iwabe, Takashi Miyata

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses of jawed vertebrates based on mitochondrial sequences often result in confusing inferences which are obviously inconsistent with generally accepted trees. In particular, in a hypothesis by Rasmussen and Arnason based on mitochondrial trees, cartilaginous fishes have a terminal position in a paraphyletic cluster of bony fishes. No previous analysis based on nuclear DNA-coded genes could significantly reject the mitochondrial trees of jawed vertebrates.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Portugal 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 75%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,605,367
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#1,043
of 1,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,642
of 295,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them