↓ Skip to main content

The aquaporins

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The aquaporins
Published in
Genome Biology, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/gb-2006-7-2-206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Kruse, Norbert Uehlein, Ralf Kaldenhoff

Abstract

Water is the major component of all living cells, and efficient regulation of water homeostasis is essential for many biological processes. The mechanism by which water passes through biological membranes was a matter of debate until the discovery of the aquaporin water channels. Aquaporins are intrinsic membrane proteins characterized by six transmembrane helices that selectively allow water or other small uncharged molecules to pass along the osmotic gradient. In addition, recent observations show that some aquaporins also facilitate the transport of volatile substances, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and ammonia (NH3), across membranes. Aquaporins usually form tetramers, with each monomer defining a single pore. Aquaporin-related proteins are found in all organisms, from archaea to mammals. In both uni- and multicellular organisms, numerous isoforms have been identified that are differentially expressed and modified by post-translational processes, thus allowing fine-tuned tissue-specific osmoregulation. In mammals, aquaporins are involved in multiple physiological processes, including kidney and salivary gland function. They are associated with several clinical disorders, such as kidney dysfunction, loss of vision and brain edema.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
India 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 266 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 19%
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 14%
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Engineering 11 4%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 65 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,489
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,795
of 91,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.