↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral metabolic effects of strict versus conventional glycaemic targets following severe traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebral metabolic effects of strict versus conventional glycaemic targets following severe traumatic brain injury
Published in
Critical Care, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1933-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark P. Plummer, Natalia Notkina, Ivan Timofeev, Peter J. Hutchinson, Mark E. Finnis, Arun K. Gupta

Abstract

Optimal glycaemic targets for patients with severe traumatic brain injury remain unclear. The primary objective of this microdialysis study was to compare cerebral metabolism with strict versus conventional glycaemic control. We performed a prospective single-centre randomised controlled within-subject crossover study of 20 adult patients admitted to an academic neurointensive care unit with severe traumatic brain injury. Patients underwent randomised, consecutive 24-h periods of strict (4-7 mmol/L; 72-126 mg/dl) and conventional (<10 mmol/L; 180 mg/dl) glycaemic control with microdialysis measurements performed hourly. The first 12 h of each study period was designated as a 'washout' period, with the subsequent 12 h being the period of interest. Cerebral glucose was lower during strict glycaemia than with conventional control (mean 1.05 [95% CI 0.58-1.51] mmol/L versus 1.28 [0.81-1.74] mmol/L; P = 0.03), as was lactate (3.07 [2.44-3.70] versus 3.56 [2.81-4.30]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in pyruvate or the lactate/pyruvate ratio between treatment phases. Strict glycaemia increased the frequency of low cerebral glucose (< 0.8 mmol/L; OR 1.91 [95% CI 1.01-3.65]; P < 0.05); however, there were no differences in the frequency of critically low glucose (< 0.2 mmol/L) or critically elevated lactate/pyruvate ratio between phases. Compared with conventional glycaemic targets, strict blood glucose control was associated with lower mean levels of cerebral glucose and an increased frequency of abnormally low glucose levels. These data support conventional glycaemic targets following traumatic brain injury. ISRCTN, ISRCTN19146279 . Retrospectively registered on 2 May 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Psychology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 37 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,311,995
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,037
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,351
of 450,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#63
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.