↓ Skip to main content

Seahawk: moving beyond HTML in Web-based bioinformatics analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
10 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seahawk: moving beyond HTML in Web-based bioinformatics analysis
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-8-208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul MK Gordon, Christoph W Sensen

Abstract

Traditional HTML interfaces for input to and output from Bioinformatics analysis on the Web are highly variable in style, content and data formats. Combining multiple analyses can therefore be an onerous task for biologists. Semantic Web Services allow automated discovery of conceptual links between remote data analysis servers. A shared data ontology and service discovery/execution framework is particularly attractive in Bioinformatics, where data and services are often both disparate and distributed. Instead of biologists copying, pasting and reformatting data between various Web sites, Semantic Web Service protocols such as MOBY-S hold out the promise of seamlessly integrating multi-step analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 7%
Canada 3 5%
United Kingdom 3 5%
Sweden 2 3%
Netherlands 2 3%
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 42 70%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Professor 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 43%
Computer Science 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Engineering 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,842,295
of 25,119,447 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,858
of 7,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,382
of 76,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#17
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,119,447 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.