↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of sexual asymmetry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of sexual asymmetry
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-4-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamás L Czárán, Rolf F Hoekstra

Abstract

The clear dominance of two-gender sex in recent species is a notorious puzzle of evolutionary theory. It has at least two layers: besides the most fundamental and challenging question why sex exists at all, the other part of the problem is equally perplexing but much less studied. Why do most sexual organisms use a binary mating system? Even if sex confers an evolutionary advantage (through whatever genetic mechanism), why does it manifest that advantage in two, and exactly two, genders (or mating types)? Why not just one, and why not more than two?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Netherlands 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 53%
Environmental Science 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,219,402
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#279
of 3,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,361
of 73,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.