↓ Skip to main content

Genome comparison of the epiphytic bacteria Erwinia billingiae and E. tasmaniensis with the pear pathogen E. pyrifoliae

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome comparison of the epiphytic bacteria Erwinia billingiae and E. tasmaniensis with the pear pathogen E. pyrifoliae
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Kube, Alexander M Migdoll, Isabel Gehring, Katja Heitmann, Yvonne Mayer, Heiner Kuhl, Florian Knaust, Klaus Geider, Richard Reinhardt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 79 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#761,901
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#88
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,096
of 104,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.