↓ Skip to main content

Antidepressants and inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antidepressants and inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review
Published in
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1745-0179-2-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonina A Mikocka-Walus, Deborah A Turnbull, Nicole T Moulding, Ian G Wilson, Jane M Andrews, Gerald J Holtmann

Abstract

A number of studies have suggested a link between the patient's psyche and the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although pharmacotherapy with antidepressants has not been widely explored, some investigators have proposed that treating psychological co-morbidities with antidepressants may help to control disease activity. To date a systematic analysis of the available studies assessing the efficacy of antidepressants for the control of somatic symptoms in IBD patients has not been performed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Psychology 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,095,095
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
#64
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,305
of 87,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.