↓ Skip to main content

Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
patent
17 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1910 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury
Published in
Critical Care, January 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc5713
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravindra L Mehta, John A Kellum, Sudhir V Shah, Bruce A Molitoris, Claudio Ronco, David G Warnock, Adeera Levin

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex disorder for which currently there is no accepted definition. Having a uniform standard for diagnosing and classifying AKI would enhance our ability to manage these patients. Future clinical and translational research in AKI will require collaborative networks of investigators drawn from various disciplines, dissemination of information via multidisciplinary joint conferences and publications, and improved translation of knowledge from pre-clinical research. We describe an initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,910 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Egypt 2 <1%
Other 28 1%
Unknown 1841 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 261 14%
Student > Postgraduate 246 13%
Student > Master 233 12%
Other 187 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 186 10%
Other 504 26%
Unknown 293 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1128 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 64 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 3%
Other 135 7%
Unknown 388 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#826,792
of 19,180,943 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#710
of 5,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,849
of 306,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,180,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.