You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc5713 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ravindra L Mehta, John A Kellum, Sudhir V Shah, Bruce A Molitoris, Claudio Ronco, David G Warnock, Adeera Levin, the Acute Kidney Injury Network |
| Abstract |
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex disorder for which currently there is no accepted definition. Having a uniform standard for diagnosing and classifying AKI would enhance our ability to manage these patients. Future clinical and translational research in AKI will require collaborative networks of investigators drawn from various disciplines, dissemination of information via multidisciplinary joint conferences and publications, and improved translation of knowledge from pre-clinical research. We describe an initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 15% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2350 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 288 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 268 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 263 | 11% |
| Other | 223 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 221 | 9% |
| Other | 592 | 24% |
| Unknown | 563 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1250 | 52% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 76 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 73 | 3% |
| Other | 199 | 8% |
| Unknown | 655 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#969,123
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#743
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,720
of 94,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.