You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diversity of wetland plants used traditionally in China: a literature review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-10-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yin Zhang, Hualin Xu, Hui Chen, Fei Wang, Huyin Huai |
Abstract |
In comparison with terrestrial plants, those growing in wetlands have been rarely studied ethnobotanically, including in China, yet people living in or near wetlands can accumulate much knowledge of the uses of local wetland plants. A characteristic of wetlands, cutting across climatic zones, is that many species are widely distributed, providing opportunities for studying general patterns of knowledge of the uses of plants across extensive areas, in the present case China. There is urgency in undertaking such studies, given the rapid rates of loss of traditional knowledge of wetland plants as is now occurring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,948,032
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#273
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,437
of 255,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.