↓ Skip to main content

Variations of circulating cardiac biomarkers during and after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variations of circulating cardiac biomarkers during and after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in breast cancer patients
Published in
BMC Cancer, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4015-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Frères, Nassim Bouznad, Laurence Servais, Claire Josse, Stéphane Wenric, Aurélie Poncin, Jérôme Thiry, Marie Moonen, Cécile Oury, Patrizio Lancellotti, Vincent Bours, Guy Jerusalem

Abstract

Over time, the chance of cure after the diagnosis of breast cancer has been increasing, as a consequence of earlier diagnosis, improved diagnostic procedures and more effective treatment options. However, oncologists are concerned by the risk of long term treatment side effects, including congestive heart failure (CHF). In this study, we evaluated innovative circulating cardiac biomarkers during and after anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. Levels of cardiac-specific troponins T (cTnT), N-terminal natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP), soluble ST2 (sST2) and 10 circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) were measured. Under chemotherapy, we observed an elevation of cTnT and NT-proBNP levels, but also the upregulation of sST2 and of 4 CHF-related miRNAs (miR-126-3p, miR-199a-3p, miR-423-5p, miR-34a-5p). The elevations of cTnT, NT-proBNP, sST2 and CHF-related miRNAs were poorly correlated, suggesting that these molecules could provide different information. Circulating miRNA and sST2 are potential biomarkers of the chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CRCD). Nevertheless, further studies and long-term follow-up are needed in order to evaluate if these new markers may help to predict CRCD and to identify the patients at risk to later develop CHF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,800,188
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#575
of 8,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,171
of 441,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#21
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.