↓ Skip to main content

Opisthobranchia (Mollusca, Gastropoda) – more than just slimy slugs. Shell reduction and its implications on defence and foraging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opisthobranchia (Mollusca, Gastropoda) – more than just slimy slugs. Shell reduction and its implications on defence and foraging
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, February 2005
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heike Wägele, Annette Klussmann-Kolb

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In general shell-less slugs are considered to be slimy animals with a rather dull appearance and a pest to garden plants. But marine slugs usually are beautifully coloured animals belonging to the less-known Opisthobranchia. They are characterized by a large array of interesting biological phenomena, usually related to foraging and/or defence. In this paper our knowledge of shell reduction, correlated with the evolution of different defensive and foraging strategies is reviewed, and new results on histology of different glandular systems are included. RESULTS: Based on a phylogeny obtained by morphological and histological data, the parallel reduction of the shell within the different groups is outlined. Major food sources are given and glandular structures are described as possible defensive structures in the external epithelia, and as internal glands. CONCLUSION: According to phylogenetic analyses, the reduction of the shell correlates with the evolution of defensive strategies. Many different kinds of defence structures, like cleptocnides, mantle dermal formations (MDFs), and acid glands, are only present in shell-less slugs. In several cases, it is not clear whether the defensive devices were a prerequisite for the reduction of the shell, or reduction occurred before. Reduction of the shell and acquisition of different defensive structures had an implication on exploration of new food sources and therefore likely enhanced adaptive radiation of several groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Malaysia 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 192 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 21%
Researcher 39 19%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 57%
Environmental Science 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 5%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 30 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#343
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,822
of 72,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.