↓ Skip to main content

Estimated dietary iodine intake as a predictor of placental size: evidence from the ELSPAC study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated dietary iodine intake as a predictor of placental size: evidence from the ELSPAC study
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12986-018-0240-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Bienertová-Vašků, Markéta Grulichová, Ondřej Mikeš, Filip Zlámal, Tomáš Pruša, Aneta Pohořalá, Lenka Andrýsková, Hynek Pikhart

Abstract

The relationship between low iodine status and pregnancy-associated comorbidities has been known for decades. The relationship between iodine intake and placental pathologies is, however, far less clear. This study was designed to examine the relationship between dietary iodine intake and placental size while also focusing on typical adverse pregnancy outcomes. The dietary iodine intake of 4711 pregnant women enrolled in the Czech part of the European Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ELSPAC) in 1990-1991 was established using a 145-item food frequency questionnaire. Multivariate linear regression models were used to estimate the relationship between dietary iodine intake during pregnancy and placental weight. Additional models were constructed to investigate the relationship between estimated dietary iodine intake and adverse birth outcomes. The estimated average iodine intake in the ELSPAC cohort was 106.6 μg/day. In the fully adjusted model, estimated dietary iodine intake was found to be significantly negatively associated with placental weight (β = -0.025, 95% CI: -0.044; -0.006, p = 0.011). Moreover, estimated dietary iodine intake was found to be significantly positively associated with the birth weight / placental weight ratio in the fully adjusted model (β = -0.024, 95% CI: 0.004; 0.043, p = 0.016). This study provides evidence of a relationship between estimated dietary iodine intake and placental weight and the birth weight / placental weight ratio. Additional research is warranted to provide more insight into the role of iodine in early as well as late placentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,822,650
of 25,048,615 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#638
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,799
of 453,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,048,615 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.