You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5 |
| Authors |
Christian Kohl, Emma J. McIntosh, Stefan Unger, Neal R. Haddaway, Steffen Kecke, Joachim Schiemann, Ralf Wilhelm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 28% |
| South Africa | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 63% |
| Scientists | 13 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 452 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 13% |
| Librarian | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 20% |
| Unknown | 109 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 45 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 6% |
| Psychology | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 120 | 27% |
| Unknown | 146 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,292,378
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#42
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,883
of 453,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.