↓ Skip to main content

Molecular phylogeny and taxonomic revision of the sportive lemurs (Lepilemur, Primates)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
43 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular phylogeny and taxonomic revision of the sportive lemurs (Lepilemur, Primates)
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-6-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Andriaholinirina, Jean-Luc Fausser, Christian Roos, Dietmar Zinner, Urs Thalmann, Clément Rabarivola, Iary Ravoarimanana, Jörg U Ganzhorn, Bernhard Meier, Roland Hilgartner, Lutz Walter, Alphonse Zaramody, Christoph Langer, Thomas Hahn, Elke Zimmermann, Ute Radespiel, Mathias Craul, Jürgen Tomiuk, Ian Tattersall, Yves Rumpler

Abstract

The number of species within the Malagasy genus Lepilemur and their phylogenetic relationships is disputed and controversial. In order to establish their evolutionary relationships, a comparative cytogenetic and molecular study was performed. We sequenced the complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (1140 bp) from 68 individuals representing all eight sportive lemur species and most major populations, and compared the results with those obtained from cytogenetic studies derived from 99 specimens.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 126 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 62%
Environmental Science 18 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 11 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,025
of 92,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.