↓ Skip to main content

Functional chloroplasts in metazoan cells - a unique evolutionary strategy in animal life

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
20 X users
wikipedia
31 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional chloroplasts in metazoan cells - a unique evolutionary strategy in animal life
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-6-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Händeler, Yvonne P Grzymbowski, Patrick J Krug, Heike Wägele

Abstract

Among metazoans, retention of functional diet-derived chloroplasts (kleptoplasty) is known only from the sea slug taxon Sacoglossa (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). Intracellular maintenance of plastids in the slug's digestive epithelium has long attracted interest given its implications for understanding the evolution of endosymbiosis. However, photosynthetic ability varies widely among sacoglossans; some species have no plastid retention while others survive for months solely on photosynthesis. We present a molecular phylogenetic hypothesis for the Sacoglossa and a survey of kleptoplasty from representatives of all major clades. We sought to quantify variation in photosynthetic ability among lineages, identify phylogenetic origins of plastid retention, and assess whether kleptoplasty was a key character in the radiation of the Sacoglossa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 195 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 29 14%
Professor 11 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 12%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 27 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,037,707
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#54
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,776
of 179,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them