You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can linear transportation infrastructure verges constitute a habitat and/or a corridor for insects in temperate landscapes? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0117-3 |
Authors |
Anne Villemey, Arzhvaël Jeusset, Marianne Vargac, Yves Bertheau, Aurélie Coulon, Julien Touroult, Sylvie Vanpeene, Bastien Castagneyrol, Hervé Jactel, Isabelle Witte, Nadine Deniaud, Frédérique Flamerie De Lachapelle, Emmanuel Jaslier, Véronique Roy, Eric Guinard, Eric Le Mitouard, Vanessa Rauel, Romain Sordello |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
France | 3 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 20% |
Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 44 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 34% |
Environmental Science | 43 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 56 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,460,037
of 25,149,126 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#51
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,130
of 449,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,149,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.