↓ Skip to main content

From biomedicine to natural history research: EST resources for ambystomatid salamanders

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From biomedicine to natural history research: EST resources for ambystomatid salamanders
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-5-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srikrishna Putta, Jeramiah J Smith, John A Walker, Mathieu Rondet, David W Weisrock, James Monaghan, Amy K Samuels, Kevin Kump, David C King, Nicholas J Maness, Bianca Habermann, Elly Tanaka, Susan V Bryant, David M Gardiner, David M Parichy, S Randal Voss

Abstract

Establishing genomic resources for closely related species will provide comparative insights that are crucial for understanding diversity and variability at multiple levels of biological organization. We developed ESTs for Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) and Eastern tiger salamander (A. tigrinum tigrinum), species with deep and diverse research histories.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Sweden 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 76 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 19%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 8 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,122,317
of 12,373,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,850
of 7,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,816
of 265,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#66
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.