You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
To eat or to breathe? The answer is both! Nutritional management during noninvasive ventilation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-1947-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Singer, Sornwichate Rattanachaiwong |
| Abstract |
Treating respiratory distress is a priority when managing critically ill patients. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is increasingly used as a tool to prevent endotracheal intubation. Providing oral or enteral nutritional support during NIV may be perceived as unsafe because of the possible risk of aspiration so that these patients are frequently denied adequate caloric and protein intake. Newly available therapies, such as high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) may allow for more appropriate oral feeding. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 22% |
| United States | 10 | 12% |
| Ireland | 9 | 10% |
| Colombia | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 33 | 38% |
| Scientists | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#806,096
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#594
of 6,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,022
of 446,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.