↓ Skip to main content

A cross sectional analysis of behaviors related to operating gas stoves and pneumonia in U.S. children under the age of 5

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross sectional analysis of behaviors related to operating gas stoves and pneumonia in U.S. children under the age of 5
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1425-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric S Coker, Ellen Smit, Anna K Harding, John Molitor, Molly L Kile

Abstract

BackgroundPoorly ventilated combustion stoves and pollutants emitted from combustion stoves increase the risk of acute lower respiratory illnesses (ALRI) in children living in developing countries but few studies have examined these issues in developed countries. Our objective is to investigate behaviors related to gas stove use, namely using them for heat and without ventilation, on the odds of pneumonia and cough in U.S. children.MethodsThe National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988¿1994) was used to identify children¿<¿5 years who lived in homes with a gas stove and whose parents provided information on their behaviors when operating their gas stoves and data on pneumonia (N¿=¿3,289) and cough (N¿=¿3,127). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the association between each respiratory outcome and using a gas stove for heat or without ventilation, as well as, the joint effect of both behaviors.ResultsThe adjusted odds of parental-reported pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]¿=¿2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08, 4.03) and cough (aOR¿=¿1.66, 95%CI: 1.14, 2.43) were higher among children who lived in homes where gas stoves were used for heat compared to those who lived in homes where gas stoves were only used for cooking. The odds of pneumonia (aOR¿=¿1.76, 95%CI: 1.04, 2.98), but not cough (aOR¿=¿1.23, 95%CI: 0.87, 1.75), was higher among those children whose parents did not report using ventilation when operating gas stoves compared to those who did use ventilation. When considering the joint association of both stove operating conditions, only children whose parents reported using gas stoves for heat without ventilation had significantly higher odds of pneumonia (aOR¿=¿3.06, 95% CI: 1.32, 7.09) and coughing (aOR¿=¿2.07, 95% CI: 1.29, 3.30) after adjusting for other risk factors.ConclusionsUsing gas stoves for heat without ventilation was associated with higher odds of pneumonia and cough among U.S. children less than five years old who live in homes with a gas stove. More research is needed to determine if emissions from gas stoves ventilation infrastructure, or modifiable behaviors contribute to respiratory infections in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 25 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Environmental Science 7 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 29 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#874,269
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#921
of 16,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,136
of 362,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#18
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.