↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetic variability and exposures of fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in intensive care unit patients: Data from multinational Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit (DALI…

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacokinetic variability and exposures of fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in intensive care unit patients: Data from multinational Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit (DALI) patients Study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0758-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahipal G Sinnollareddy, Jason A Roberts, Jeffrey Lipman, Murat Akova, Matteo Bassetti, Jan J De Waele, Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen, Despoina Koulenti, Claude Martin, Philippe Montravers, Jordi Rello, Andrew Rhodes, Therese Starr, Steven C Wallis, George Dimopoulos

Abstract

The objective of the study was to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in critically ill patients and to compare with previously published data. We also sought to determine whether contemporary fluconazole doses achieved PK/pharmacodynamic (PD; PK/PD) targets in this cohort of intensive care unit patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Other 12 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 13 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,597,871
of 21,375,605 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,463
of 5,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,653
of 321,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,375,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.