↓ Skip to main content

Liver resection surgery versus thermal ablation for colorectal LiVer MetAstases (LAVA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Liver resection surgery versus thermal ablation for colorectal LiVer MetAstases (LAVA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2499-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Gurusamy, Neil Corrigan, Julie Croft, Maureen Twiddy, Stephen Morris, Nick Woodward, Steve Bandula, Daniel Hochhauser, Vicky Napp, Alison Pullan, Nicholas Jakowiw, Raj Prasad, Steven Olde Damink, C. J. H. M. van Laarhoven, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Julia Brown, Brian R. Davidson

Abstract

Although surgical resection has been considered the only curative option for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), thermal ablation has recently been suggested as an alternative curative treatment. A prospective randomised trial is required to define the efficacy of resection vs ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Design and setting: This is a multicentre, open, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial design with internal pilot and will be performed in tertiary liver centres in UK and The Netherlands. Eligible patients will be those with colorectal liver metastases at high surgical risk because of their age, co-morbidities or tumour burden and who would be suitable for liver resection or thermal ablation. Thermal ablation as per local policy. Surgical liver resection performed as per centre protocol. Co-interventions: Further chemotherapy will be offered to patients as per current practice. Outcomes Pilot study: Same as main study and in addition patients and clinicians' acceptability of the trial to assist in optimisation of recruitment. Disease-free survival (DFS) at two years post randomisation. Overall survival, timing and site of recurrence, additional therapy after treatment failure, quality of life, complications, length of hospital stay, costs, trial acceptability, DFS measured from end of intervention. 24 months from randomisation; five-year follow-up for overall survival. 330 patients to demonstrate non-inferiority of thermal ablation. This trial will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of thermal ablation vs surgical resection for high-risk people with colorectal liver metastases, and guide the optimal treatment for these patients. ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN52040363 . Registered on 9 March 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 39 37%