↓ Skip to main content

The emergence and diffusion of DNA microarray technology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The emergence and diffusion of DNA microarray technology
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1747-5333-1-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Lenoir, Eric Giannella

Abstract

The network model of innovation widely adopted among researchers in the economics of science and technology posits relatively porous boundaries between firms and academic research programs and a bi-directional flow of inventions, personnel, and tacit knowledge between sites of university and industry innovation. Moreover, the model suggests that these bi-directional flows should be considered as mutual stimulation of research and invention in both industry and academe, operating as a positive feedback loop. One side of this bi-directional flow--namely; the flow of inventions into industry through the licensing of university-based technologies--has been well studied; but the reverse phenomenon of the stimulation of university research through the absorption of new directions emanating from industry has yet to be investigated in much detail. We discuss the role of federal funding of academic research in the microarray field, and the multiple pathways through which federally supported development of commercial microarray technologies have transformed core academic research fields.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Unknown 115 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration
#6
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,260
of 92,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them