↓ Skip to main content

Using evidence from different sources: an example using paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using evidence from different sources: an example using paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2001
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-1-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley A Smith, R Andrew Moore, Henry J McQuay, David Gavaghan

Abstract

Meta-analysis usually restricts the information pooled, for instance using only randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. This neglects other types of high quality information. This review explores using different information for the combination of paracetamol 1000 mg and codeine 60 mg in acute postoperative pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,320,094
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,507
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,614
of 114,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them