↓ Skip to main content

Using evidence from different sources: an example using paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using evidence from different sources: an example using paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2001
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-1-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley A Smith, R Andrew Moore, Henry J McQuay, David Gavaghan

Abstract

Meta-analysis usually restricts the information pooled, for instance using only randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. This neglects other types of high quality information. This review explores using different information for the combination of paracetamol 1000 mg and codeine 60 mg in acute postoperative pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,507,785
of 4,715,210 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#374
of 570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,933
of 164,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,715,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 570 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.