↓ Skip to main content

Evidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: A systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-7-119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma Flores-Mateo, Josep M Argimon

Abstract

Training in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) has been widely implemented throughout medical school and residency curricula. The aim of this study is to systematically review studies that assessed the effectiveness of EBP teaching to improve knowledge, skills, attitudes and behavior of postgraduate healthcare workers, and to describe instruments available to evaluate EBP teaching.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 193 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor 13 6%
Other 65 32%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Psychology 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 37 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,782
of 7,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,576
of 67,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.