↓ Skip to main content

The wild taxa utilized as vegetables in Sicily (Italy): a traditional component of the Mediterranean diet

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The wild taxa utilized as vegetables in Sicily (Italy): a traditional component of the Mediterranean diet
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13002-018-0215-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Geraci, Filippo Amato, Giuseppe Di Noto, Giuseppe Bazan, Rosario Schicchi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 42 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 25%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 49 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,527,022
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#219
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,328
of 459,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.