You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Auxiliary variables in multiple imputation in regression with missing X: a warning against including too many in small sample research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jochen Hardt, Max Herke, Rainer Leonhart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 22% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 14 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,492,327
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,521
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,074
of 279,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.