↓ Skip to main content

High frequency of lactose intolerance in a prehistoric hunter-gatherer population in northern Europe

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High frequency of lactose intolerance in a prehistoric hunter-gatherer population in northern Europe
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena Malmström, Anna Linderholm, Kerstin Lidén, Jan Storå, Petra Molnar, Gunilla Holmlund, Mattias Jakobsson, Anders Götherström

Abstract

Genes and culture are believed to interact, but it has been difficult to find direct evidence for the process. One candidate example that has been put forward is lactase persistence in adulthood, i.e. the ability to continue digesting the milk sugar lactose after childhood, facilitating the consumption of raw milk. This genetic trait is believed to have evolved within a short time period and to be related with the emergence of sedentary agriculture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 157 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 23%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 15%
Arts and Humanities 21 12%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 18 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,392,160
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#330
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,503
of 103,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.