↓ Skip to main content

CDK9 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 2,380)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
4 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CDK9 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13046-018-0704-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Boffo, Angela Damato, Luigi Alfano, Antonio Giordano

Abstract

Current treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is less than optimal, but increased understanding of disease pathobiology and genomics has led to clinical investigation of novel targeted therapies and rational combinations. Targeting the cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) pathway, which is dysregulated in AML, is an attractive approach. Inhibition of CDK9 leads to downregulation of cell survival genes regulated by super enhancers such as MCL-1, MYC, and cyclin D1. As CDK9 inhibitors are nonselective, predictive biomarkers that may help identify patients most likely to respond to CDK9 inhibitors are now being utilized, with the goal of improving efficacy and safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Chemistry 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#848,179
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#29
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,197
of 343,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.