You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Positive postpartum depression screening practices and subsequent mental health treatment for low-income women in Western countries: a systematic literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Reviews, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40985-017-0050-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elinor Hansotte, Shirley I. Payne, Suzanne M. Babich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Uganda | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 270 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 97 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 16% |
| Psychology | 23 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 97 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#649,877
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#18
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,962
of 426,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.