↓ Skip to main content

Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation and Regeneration, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 258)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
491 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering
Published in
Inflammation and Regeneration, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41232-018-0059-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaicy Jacob, Namdev More, Kiran Kalia, Govinda Kapusetti

Abstract

Tissues like bone and cartilage are remodeled dynamically for their functional requirements by signaling pathways. The signals are controlled by the cells and extracellular matrix and transmitted through an electrical and chemical synapse. Scaffold-based tissue engineering therapies largely disturb the natural signaling pathways, due to their rigidity towards signal conduction, despite their therapeutic advantages. Thus, there is a high need of smart biomaterials, which can conveniently generate and transfer the bioelectric signals analogous to native tissues for appropriate physiological functions. Piezoelectric materials can generate electrical signals in response to the applied stress. Furthermore, they can stimulate the signaling pathways and thereby enhance the tissue regeneration at the impaired site. The piezoelectric scaffolds can act as sensitive mechanoelectrical transduction systems. Hence, it is applicable to the regions, where mechanical loads are predominant. The present review is mainly concentrated on the mechanism related to the electrical stimulation in a biological system and the different piezoelectric materials suitable for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 491 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 13%
Researcher 50 10%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 62 13%
Unknown 156 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 89 18%
Materials Science 76 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 6%
Chemistry 20 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 3%
Other 71 14%
Unknown 190 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#512,860
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation and Regeneration
#7
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,830
of 343,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation and Regeneration
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them