↓ Skip to main content

Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
137 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
506 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
562 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem
Published in
Microbiome, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40168-018-0420-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stilianos Louca, Michael Doebeli, Laura Wegener Parfrey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 562 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 147 26%
Researcher 93 17%
Student > Master 80 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 65 12%
Unknown 102 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 168 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 113 20%
Environmental Science 47 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 6%
Engineering 18 3%
Other 52 9%
Unknown 129 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#514,640
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#126
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,698
of 344,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#5
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.