You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of immunization status among 12- to 23-month-old children in Indonesia (2008–2013): a multilevel analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-5193-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Holipah, Asri Maharani, Yoshiki Kuroda |
| Abstract |
Immunization is one of the most cost-effective public health interventions to prevent children from contracting vaccine-preventable diseases. Indonesia launched the Expanded Program for Immunization (EPI) in 1977. However, immunization coverage remains far below the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization (WHO) target of 80%. This study aims to investigate the determinants of complete immunization status among children aged 12-23 months in Indonesia. We used three waves of the Indonesian National Socioeconomic Survey (2008, 2011, and 2013) and national village censuses from the same years. Multilevel logistic regression was used to conduct the analysis. The number of immunized children increased from 47.48% in 2008 to 61.83% in 2013. The presence of health professionals, having an older mother, and having more educated mothers were associated with a higher probability of a child's receiving full immunization. Increasing the numbers of hospitals, village health posts, and health workers was positively associated with children receiving full immunization. The MOR (median odds ratio) showed that children's likelihood of receiving complete immunization varied significantly among districts. Both household- and district-level determinants were found to be associated with childhood immunization status. Policy makers may take these determinants into account to increase immunization coverage in Indonesia. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 351 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 13% |
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 135 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 142 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,779,069
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,175
of 14,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,329
of 330,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#143
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.