↓ Skip to main content

Functional status of persons with chronic fatigue syndrome in the Wichita, Kansas, population

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional status of persons with chronic fatigue syndrome in the Wichita, Kansas, population
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2003
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-1-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Solomon, Rosane Nisenbaum, Michele Reyes, Dimitris A Papanicolaou, William C Reeves

Abstract

Scant research has adequately addressed the impact of chronic fatigue syndrome on patients' daily activities and quality of life. Enumerating specific problems related to quality of life in chronic fatigue syndrome patients can help us to better understand and manage this illness. This study addresses issues of functional status in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome and other fatiguing illnesses in a population based sample, which can be generalized to all persons with chronic fatigue.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Psychology 8 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#976
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,830
of 56,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.