↓ Skip to main content

Police and public health partnerships: Evidence from the evaluation of Vancouver's supervised injection facility

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Police and public health partnerships: Evidence from the evaluation of Vancouver's supervised injection facility
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, May 2008
DOI 10.1186/1747-597x-3-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kora DeBeck, Evan Wood, Ruth Zhang, Mark Tyndall, Julio Montaner, Thomas Kerr

Abstract

In various settings, drug market policing strategies have been found to have unintended negative effects on health service use among injection drug users (IDU). This has prompted calls for more effective coordination of policing and public health efforts. In Vancouver, Canada, a supervised injection facility (SIF) was established in 2003. We sought to determine if local police impacted utilization of the SIF. We used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to prospectively identify the prevalence and correlates of being referred by local police to Vancouver's SIF among IDU participating in the Scientific Evaluation of Supervised Injecting (SEOSI) cohort during the period of December 2003 to November 2005. Among 1090 SIF clients enrolled in SEOSI, 182 (16.7%) individuals reported having ever been referred to the SIF by local police. At baseline, 22 (2.0%) participants reported that they first learned of the SIF via police. In multivariate analyses, factors positively associated with being referred to the SIF by local police when injecting in public include: sex work (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 1.80, 95%CI 1.28-2.53); daily cocaine injection (AOR = 1.54, 95%CI 1.14-2.08); and unsafe syringe disposal (AOR = 1.46, 95%CI 1.00-2.11). These findings indicate that local police are facilitating use of the SIF by IDU at high risk for various adverse health outcomes. We further found that police may be helping to address public order concerns by referring IDU who are more likely to discard used syringes in public spaces. Our study suggests that the SIF provides an opportunity to coordinate policing and public health efforts and thereby resolve some of the existing tensions between public order and health initiatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 23%
Social Sciences 27 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Psychology 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,121,180
of 25,270,999 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#226
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,381
of 85,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,270,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.