↓ Skip to main content

Management of acute aortic dissection and thoracic aortic rupture

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 572)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of acute aortic dissection and thoracic aortic rupture
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40560-018-0287-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshihiro Fukui

Abstract

Both acute aortic dissection and ruptured aortic aneurysm are leading causes of death in cardiovascular disease. These life-threatening conditions have recently been categorized as acute aortic syndrome. This review describes the etiology, clinical presentation, and therapeutic options for acute aortic syndrome including acute aortic dissection and ruptured aortic aneurysm. Several diagnostic tools for detecting these critical conditions have been developed including computed tomography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laboratory tests. Early and accurate diagnosis is most important to determine appropriate treatment. Initial treatment for these conditions should be aimed at controlling pain and the hemodynamic state with further treatment based on the imaging diagnosis and hematological assessment. Surgical outcomes after acute aortic syndrome are improving gradually; however, mortality remains high. Recently, thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become an alternative technique to treat complicated type B aortic dissection. Rapid treatment after early diagnosis is essential to save patients' lives. Continuous advances in imaging and treatment technologies are improving short- and long-term outcomes in patients with acute aortic syndrome. Knowledge and interest in intensive care medicine in this area are contributing to improved outcomes, and further research into this life-threatening disease will lead to improvements in diagnosis and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 246 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 17%
Other 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 75 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 83 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#173,279
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#7
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,092
of 337,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.