You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Screening for infectious diseases of asylum seekers upon arrival: the necessity of the moral principle of reciprocity
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-018-0256-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dorien T. Beeres, Darren Cornish, Machiel Vonk, Sofanne J. Ravensbergen, Els L. M. Maeckelberghe, Pieter Boele Van Hensbroek, Ymkje Stienstra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,372,374
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#233
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,078
of 350,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.