You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
AceView: a comprehensive cDNA-supported gene and transcripts annotation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle Thierry-Mieg, Jean Thierry-Mieg |
| Abstract |
Regions covering one percent of the genome, selected by ENCODE for extensive analysis, were annotated by the HAVANA/Gencode group with high quality transcripts, thus defining a benchmark. The ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project (EGASP) competition aimed at reproducing Gencode and finding new genes. The organizers evaluated the protein predictions in depth. We present a complementary analysis of the mRNAs, including alternative transcript variants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 24% |
| Researcher | 60 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 116 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,799
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,373
of 93,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.