MUAC-for-age more useful than absolute MUAC for nutritional surveillance in Somalia: results from nineteen cross-sectional surveys (2007–2016)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nutrition, February 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source

twitter: 4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation: 8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 47 Mendeley

Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations

So far, Dimensions has found 8 publications that cite this research output.

8

The most recent citing publications are shown below. View all 8 publications that cite this research output on Dimensions.

Differences in wasting assessment through Middle‐Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) adjusted by sex, age and geographic origin for children aged 6–59 months: New reference based on anthropometric surveys from 22 low‐and‐middle‐income countries

Article in American Journal of Human Biology (November 2022)

Does a child's mid‐upper arm circumference‐for‐age z‐score represent another nutritional indicator of childhood malnutrition status?

Article in Maternal and Child Nutrition (July 2022)

Diagnostic ability of mid-upper arm circumference-to-length ratio in detecting wasting among infants aged 1–6 months in Ethiopia

Article in Journal of Nutritional Science (March 2022)

This page shows the most recent citations of this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.