You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of a parenting programme in a public health setting: a randomised controlled trial of the positive parenting programme (Triple P) level 3 versus care as usual provided by the preventive child healthcare (PCH)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-131 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Willem Spijkers, Daniëlle EMC Jansen, Gea de Meer, Sijmen A Reijneveld |
Abstract |
Considering the high burden of disease of psychosocial problems in children and adolescents, early intervention regarding problem behaviour of young children is very important. The Preventive Child Healthcare (PCH) offers a good setting to detect such problem behaviour and to provide parenting support to the parents concerned. This paper aims to describe the design of an effectiveness study of a parenting programme for parents of children with mild psychosocial problems after an initial, evidence based screening in routine PCH. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 85 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 24 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,353,865
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,452
of 14,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,574
of 93,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#46
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.