↓ Skip to main content

Organic farmers use of wild food plants and fungi in a hilly area in Styria (Austria)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organic farmers use of wild food plants and fungi in a hilly area in Styria (Austria)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-6-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Schunko, Christian R Vogl

Abstract

Changing lifestyles have recently caused a severe reduction of the gathering of wild food plants. Knowledge about wild food plants and the local environment becomes lost when plants are no longer gathered. In Central Europe popular scientific publications have tried to counter this trend. However, detailed and systematic scientific investigations in distinct regions are needed to understand and preserve wild food uses. This study aims to contribute to these investigations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 46%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#320
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,519
of 94,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.