You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-11-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W Gregory Hundley, David Bluemke, Jan G Bogaert, Matthias G Friedrich, Charles B Higgins, Mark A Lawson, Michael V McConnell, Subha V Raman, Albert C van Rossum, Scott Flamm, Christopher M Kramer, Eike Nagel, Stefan Neubauer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 20% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 26% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 67% |
| Engineering | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,595,692
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#715
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,554
of 108,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.