You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The european primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dionne S Kringos, Wienke GW Boerma, Yann Bourgueil, Thomas Cartier, Toralf Hasvold, Allen Hutchinson, Margus Lember, Marek Oleszczyk, Danica Rotar Pavlic, Igor Svab, Paolo Tedeschi, Andrew Wilson, Adam Windak, Toni Dedeu, Stefan Wilm |
| Abstract |
Scientific research has provided evidence on benefits of well developed primary care systems. The relevance of some of this research for the European situation is limited.There is currently a lack of up to date comprehensive and comparable information on variation in development of primary care, and a lack of knowledge of structures and strategies conducive to strengthening primary care in Europe. The EC funded project Primary Health Care Activity Monitor for Europe (PHAMEU) aims to fill this gap by developing a Primary Care Monitoring System (PC Monitor) for application in 31 European countries. This article describes the development of the indicators of the PC Monitor, which will make it possible to create an alternative model for holistic analyses of primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 306 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 19% |
| Researcher | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 78 | 24% |
| Unknown | 51 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,417,738
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#278
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,268
of 108,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.