↓ Skip to main content

Goal-directed therapy: what we know and what we need to know

Overview of attention for article published in Perioperative Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Goal-directed therapy: what we know and what we need to know
Published in
Perioperative Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13741-015-0012-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason B O’Neal, Andrew D Shaw

Abstract

Goal-directed therapy (GDT) utilizes monitoring techniques to help guide clinicians with administering fluids, vasopressors, inotropes, or other treatments to patients in various clinical settings. Multiple studies have investigated the potential benefits of GDT, but no consensus on the use of GDT exists. Future trials which address fluid and inotrope choice as well as expanding the results to evaluate patient-centered outcomes in addition to survival are warranted.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 24%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Philosophy 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 7 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,888,709
of 19,731,023 outputs
Outputs from Perioperative Medicine
#55
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,331
of 310,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perioperative Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,731,023 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them