↓ Skip to main content

Protocol: Streamline cloning of genes into binary vectors in Agrobacterium via the Gateway® TOPO vector system

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol: Streamline cloning of genes into binary vectors in Agrobacterium via the Gateway® TOPO vector system
Published in
Plant Methods, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-4-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruqiang Xu, Li Quinn Qingshun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 362 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 98 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 23%
Student > Master 49 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 41 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 248 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Chemistry 3 <1%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 43 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#509
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,805
of 156,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.