↓ Skip to main content

Indigenous use and bio-efficacy of medicinal plants in the Rasuwa District, Central Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indigenous use and bio-efficacy of medicinal plants in the Rasuwa District, Central Nepal
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-6-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yadav Uprety, Hugo Asselin, Emmanuel K Boon, Saroj Yadav, Krishna K Shrestha

Abstract

By revealing historical and present plant use, ethnobotany contributes to drug discovery and socioeconomic development. Nepal is a natural storehouse of medicinal plants. Although several ethnobotanical studies were conducted in the country, many areas remain unexplored. Furthermore, few studies have compared indigenous plant use with reported phytochemical and pharmacological properties.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 18%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 70 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 27%
Environmental Science 20 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 7%
Chemistry 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 80 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#320
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,685
of 164,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.