You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Failure to detect Xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus in Chinese patients with chronic fatigue syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-7-224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ping Hong, Jinming Li, Yongzhe Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 30% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,026,372
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#290
of 3,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,077
of 105,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.