↓ Skip to main content

Cytokine-associated neutrophil extracellular traps and antinuclear antibodies in Plasmodium falciparum infected children under six years of age

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytokine-associated neutrophil extracellular traps and antinuclear antibodies in Plasmodium falciparum infected children under six years of age
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-7-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia S Baker, Godwin E Imade, Norman B Molta, Pallavi Tawde, Sunday D Pam, Michael O Obadofin, Soloman A Sagay, Daniel Z Egah, Daniel Iya, Bangmboye B Afolabi, Murray Baker, Karen Ford, Robert Ford, Kenneth H Roux, Thomas CS Keller

Abstract

In Plasmodium falciparum-infected children, the relationships between blood cell histopathology, blood plasma components, development of immunocompetence and disease severity remain poorly understood. Blood from Nigerian children with uncomplicated malaria was analysed to gain insight into these relationships. This investigation presents evidence for circulating neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and antinuclear IgG antibodies (ANA). The presence of NETs and ANA to double-stranded DNA along with the cytokine profiles found suggests autoimmune mechanisms that could produce pathogenesis in children, but immunoprotection in adults.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 143 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 26%
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Professor 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,413,628
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,348
of 5,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,063
of 80,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.