↓ Skip to main content

Motor sequence learning occurs despite disrupted visual and proprioceptive feedback

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motor sequence learning occurs despite disrupted visual and proprioceptive feedback
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, July 2008
DOI 10.1186/1744-9081-4-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric D Vidoni, Lara A Boyd

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated the importance of proprioception for the development of internal representations of the forces encountered during a task. Evidence also exists for a significant role for proprioception in the execution of sequential movements. However, little work has explored the role of proprioceptive sensation during the learning of continuous movement sequences. Here, we report that the repeated segment of a continuous tracking task can be learned despite peripherally altered arm proprioception and severely restricted visual feedback regarding motor output.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 96 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Professor 10 10%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 16%
Neuroscience 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Engineering 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2011.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#137
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,832
of 81,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them