You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genome sequence of E. coli W (ATCC 9637): comparative genome analysis and an improved genome-scale reconstruction of E. coli
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin T Archer, Jihyun F Kim, Haeyoung Jeong, Jin Hwan Park, Claudia E Vickers, Sang Yup Lee, Lars K Nielsen |
| Abstract |
Escherichia coli is a model prokaryote, an important pathogen, and a key organism for industrial biotechnology. E. coli W (ATCC 9637), one of four strains designated as safe for laboratory purposes, has not been sequenced. E. coli W is a fast-growing strain and is the only safe strain that can utilize sucrose as a carbon source. Lifecycle analysis has demonstrated that sucrose from sugarcane is a preferred carbon source for industrial bioprocesses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 357 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 152 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 81 | 21% |
| Engineering | 23 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,116,759
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,176
of 10,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,648
of 180,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#7
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.