You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating tumor cells as marker of poor prognosis in metastatic lung cancer: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Cancer Research, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41241-018-0059-7 |
| Authors |
Mônica Taiane de Macêdo Diaz, Emne Ali Abdallah, Milena Shizue Tariki, Alexcia Camila Braun, Aldo Lourenço Abbade Dettino, Ulisses Ribaldo Nicolau, Vanessa da Silva Alves, Ludmilla Thomé Domingos Chinen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 43% |
| Brazil | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,719,376
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied Cancer Research
#7
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,869
of 350,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Cancer Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them